You Can Change The World!
The effects of glocalization on online petition platforms
Last
Saturday thousands of people protested in Amsterdam against the
infiltration of TTIP (Transatlantic Trade and Investment
Partnership) in the Netherlands. The TTIP is a bi-lateral trade agreement
between the European Union and the United States. Important segments of the
agreement are that the TTIP gives big companies more action power and it
reduces a nation’s standards (think of environmental or banking legislations
for instance) and lawful regulations that could be preventing big companies
from distributing their products. In many cities in Europe people protested
against this EU-US agreement, because they generally feel that the profit and
commercialization interests will come to surpass the care for human health.
People's thoughts about the TTIP were massively shared through online platforms
specialized in call-to-action and online petitions.
Those are petitions that are signed online, usually through a form on a
website, and can be filled out by anyone in the world who has access to the
internet. In today’s blogpost we will introduce a new kind of world citizen who
increasingly feels that local issues should be a global responsibility.
In
this blogpost we would like to make use of the analysis of glocalization,
social movements and the concept of community media by Vicki Mayer. Mayer
is a professor of communication and media at Tulane University. Glocalization
refers to the idea that producers need to change international media products
to the standards of local sites (Mikos and Perrota in Mayer 12). Mark Deuze, a
scholar working for the University of Amsterdam, writes about glocalization in
a similar way, stating that the concept is characterized by “the mutually
reinforcing developments of localization and globalization” (59). At the same
time, Mayer takes into account that social movements are becoming more and more
global due to the use of the internet (13). In her article she addresses
multiple theories about community media production, but for this blogpost we
will use Ellie Rennie’s definition in which the “stabilizing [of] non-profit
and non-governmental media production” and “media literacy and consumer
education” are key (19). Deuze equivalently refers to community media as
“communities of interest around content” (79). Furthermore, Hesmondhalgh and
Baker note that these online media communities result in a new kind of
consumer, one who not only signs petitions, but also has the possibility to
produce them (387).
In
the last few years the internet has witnessed a rise in the amount of online
petitions on popular websites like www.change.org, www.ipetition.com
or avaaz.org.
Online petitions often serve the purpose of signing for or against something
and use the medium as a means to transcend national borders and get
international support. These websites have different sectors for petitions,
from stop-shotgun, to animal ethics, to our example of TTIP. People now realize
that they can unite in a way that has never been done before, namely
transnationally. This could result in the rise of a new kind of community,
characterized by its ability to affect change without being limited to
territorial borders.
Online
petition platforms can be seen as a type of ‘community media’. Despite the fact
that they do not revolve around the production of media for the purpose of
profit making, they do attempt to reach international audiences to encourage
(local) change and call-to-action. In this sense, online petitions can be
considered glocalized: they mobilize people on a global scale in order to
attempt local change (Mayer 12). People end up forming online “communities of
interest” around content that is meaningful to them or they become advocates in
fighting for things they believe should change (Deuze 79). With enough pressure
from said internet communities, who sometimes even enter the realm of internet
vigilantism, change does occur. An example of this is the case of the dentist
who killed Cecil the lion. He had to close his practise
as a result of much negative attention in the media and pressure from the
internet. Victories for online petition communities are felt both locally and
globally when change occurs. Participants will feel more empowered, which will
strengthen and promote the building of these kinds of communities.
Petition
sites do not only encourage audiences to take part in a social movement, but
many also invite the audience to actively partake in creating petitions to meet
their own political ends (Mayer 13). This new wave of online-activism that
transcends national borders and motivates the audience to be involved in global
affairs is not a hype, but rather a new characterization of the new kind of
“citizen of the world”. A citizen of the world is someone who is not only
concerned with national affairs, but also feels responsible for events
occurring in other parts of the world. In order to relate this to the TTIP
example and the rise of petition sites, we need to acknowledge that people from
around the world are able to unite believing that they can make a change. They
consolidate to address a particular government’s decision on a continental
scale. Protestors against the TTIP treaty join together, because it enables big US companies to sue EU governments.
In
conclusion, in recent years a new kind of world citizen has arised on the
internet: one who feels the need to participate in global affairs as well as
being connected to the local. Online petitioning is a prime example of a media
platform making use of this development. Online petition websites have become
increasingly more popular over the years, and they can be seen as a reflection
of community media and glocalization. The TTIP treaty is but one example of the
many ways in which people from all over the world are becoming increasingly
engaged with local affairs. Through online media platforms and communities, we
are turning essentially territorial issues into a global concern.
Thesis
statement: Online petition platforms are mirroring developing concepts in the
field of the creative industries such as media community and glocalization,
resulting in a new kind of world citizen #TTIP
Initials:
GK, RO, AL
Works Cited
David Hesmondhalgh & Sarah Baker (2011), ‘Toward a Political Economy of Labor in the Media Industries’, in: Janet Wasko, Gragham Murdock & Helena Sousa (eds.), The Handbook of Political Economy of Communications. Blackwell Publishing, pp. 381-400.
Vicki Mayer (2013), ‘Making Media Production Visible’, in: Vicki Mayer (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Media Studies, Volume II: Media Production. Blackwell Publishing, 2013.
Mark Deuze (2007), ‘Creative Industries, Convergence Culture and Media Work’, in: Media Work. Cambridge & Malden: polity, pp. 45-83.